RatingsWhat do these ratings mean? We use the following subjective ratings to classify our reading. We developed this for non-fiction books, although we now use the scheme for fiction books and also non-fiction articles.
|
|||||
| not-to-be-missed | great | worth reading | just OK | waste of time | unfinishable |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
= |
not-to-be-missed | We give this rating for two different
reasons. 1) It's either a fabulous book; engaging, well written, and very useful. 2) Or, it's a classic text that should be read if you want a solid grasp of the topic. |
|
=
|
great | We give this rating for
materials that have depth, provide solid ideas, are well put together, and
enjoyable to read. |
|
= |
worth reading | This rating suggests a good account, worth
the time to read, but nothing necessarily life-altering. |
|
=
|
just OK | When reading doesn't deserve a strong
recommendation, but there is something to it worth mentioning, we offer this
rating. In the accompanying review, we explain what it was missing or should
have been left out. |
|
=
|
waste of time | We usually don't include materials that
seem to be a waste of time, but for some reason we're mentioning this. Be
sure to read the review notes before daring to read it yourself. |
|
=
|
unfinishable | We couldn't finish it because it was so bad, boring, shallow, or because we found it too incomprehensible. |
